In its daily bulletin today, the Vatican Information Service (VIS) announced that it now has its own blog in English, Español, Italiano and Français. See it here. The blog is allows comments and you can rate entries: Interesting? Yes very. Average. Not really.
My wife and I spent a weekend recently in a little house way back in the woods in the country. We were miles from town, hundreds from the nearest big city. Evening fell. There was no moon that night. In the country, a moonless night means a kind of enveloping darkness we city dwellers seldom experience any longer.
My wife went to play cards with the neighbors for the evening and took our flashlight to light the way down the woodland path. I told her I’d be along later. When it was time for me to make my way through the woods I realized she had taken the only flashlight. Searching for some other light source, I found an old kerosene lamp. With the soot-blackened chimney sheltering a flickering flame, I made my way slowly along the twisting, turning path, flanked on both sides by fragrant pines.
About halfway down the path, a night breeze came up suddenly and blew out my lamp. I stopped and stood there, thinking at that moment how much I would give for a single wooden match with which to relight my flame. But technology had I none.
I stood with the useless lamp in my hand, stumped and more than a little afraid of the darkness – and gradually began to come alive.
I read with some interest and head-scratching the story on NCRonline.org that the sex abuse scandal exploding in Europe will likely imperil Pope Benedict’s project to “re-Christianize” Europe, and help it reclaim its Christian heritage.
I don’t disagree with the premise; a scandal of this magnitude will not send people flocking to the church. But I’m not sure what Pope Benedict was been doing before this scandal erupted to “re-Christianize” Europe.
I do not normally cross-reference my blog posts at America magazine here, or vice-versa. But the coverage in the MSM of the "smoking gun" regarding then-Cardinal Ratzinger's handling of the case of Father Kiesle was so bad, the failure to ask simple questions so obvious, that I wish to share my concerns with as many as possible. Here is the link.
I shall be posting later today here on the subject of the anniversary of the death of Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
Chile's first canonized saint was born in Santiago on July 13, 1900, to Miguel Fernandez Jarequamada and Lucia Solar Armstrong, the fifth of their seven children. She was baptized Juana Enriqueta Josephina de los Sagrados Corazones. She was called Juanita.
It is strange to think that Justice John Paul Stevens, who was put on the Supreme Court by President Gerald Ford, will likely be replaced by someone less liberal than himself. Stevens became not only the senior vote on the Court, but its most stalwart liberal. It is doubtful anyone with his current ideological credentials could win Senate confirmation.
The most likely choice is Elena Kagan, currently the Solicitor General of the United States. Kagan was confirmed for that post last year by the Senate on a vote of 61-31, with conservative Republicans such as Senators Kyl and Lugar joining moderate Republicans like Senators Snowe and Collins voting in favor of the nomination. South Carolina Senator Lindsay Graham did not vote on the confirmation, but he can be expected to follow the position he took in support of last year’s nomination of Sonia Sotomayor. Sen. Grahah has stated that elections should have consequences and while he would not have nominated Sotomayor, a president’s selection should be respected provided the nominee is qualified for the post.
Here is more from The Associated Press story that I blogged on earlier
The [Oakland, Calif.] diocese recommended removing [Stephen] Kiesle (KEEZ'-lee) from the priesthood in 1981, the year Ratzinger was appointed to head the Vatican office which shared responsibility for disciplining abusive priests.
The case then languished for four years at the Vatican before Ratzinger finally wrote to Oakland Bishop John Cummins. It was two more years before Kiesle was removed.
In the November 1985 letter, Ratzinger says the arguments for removing Kiesle are of "grave significance" but added that such actions required very careful review and more time. He also urged the bishop to provide Kiesle with "as much paternal care as possible" while awaiting the decision …
How long does this go on? When will this end? The "this," of course, being the, oh, so dispiriting saga, now generically called "the clergy sex abuse" story. We've been on this story since 1985 when we first published reports by freelance writer Jason Berry as he covered a trial in his native Louisiana of a priest, Fr. Gilbert Gauthe, accused of having molested several young boys. We began editorializing about it that year as we began to see the story's ubiquitous twin patterns of priest abuse and episcopal cover-up.
This story is at the top of the AP news wire now:
A 1985 letter signed by Ratzinger cited concerns about the effect that removing the priest would have on "the good of the universal church."
The correspondence was obtained exclusively by The Associated Press. It is the strongest challenge yet to the Vatican's insistence that Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict XVI, played no role in blocking removal of pedophile priests while head of the Catholic Church's doctrinal watchdog office.
The letter is part of years of correspondence between the diocese of Oakland and the Vatican about the proposed defrocking of the Rev. Stephen Kiesle.
The Vatican confirmed Ratzinger's signature on the letter but declined comment on its contents.
More to come