NCR on Kindle - NCR classifieds - YouTube - Twitter - Facebook - Email Alerts - RSS
The right's duplicity unveiled on health care
Torre as a Milwaukee BraveFor decades – from at least the time Joe Torre was a backup first baseman with the Milwaukee Braves – and ever further back than that, the political right has complained that government is the problem, government programs don’t work, and are too costly and inefficient. Meanwhile the right’s mantra has also been that private enterprise does everything better because it's more creative, innovative and efficient than government.
Odd, then, that private insurers fear government competition. Odd they are so dead set against what’s being called “the public option.”
What’s the fear?
A group of private insurers warned in a letter last week to Senate Health Chairman Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) that expanding the government's role in health care would lead to "devastating consequences," including steep reductions in employer-sponsored health coverage. As if that's not happening now with double digit annual increases to businesses small and large!
In a news conference Tuesday, President Obama countered that a federal presence in the marketplace is the only way to ensure that all Americans will have access to affordable coverage.
"Just conceptually,” he said, “the notion that all these insurance companies who say they're giving consumers the best possible deal, if they can't compete against a public plan as one option, with consumers making the decision what's the best deal, that defies logic."
Why not offer it as the public option as one among many other private options? Could it be that government just might provide better health care at a lower cost? Could government efficiencies
lower health care costs?
Why not have the option?
What seems to be clear is this: The public option will never make it to the table and into law unless an outraged public stands up and demands it.
Give us the option!





You've got to be
You've got to be kidding...
The government brings with it powers like the power to tax, to subsidize and to fix prices...monopolistic powers that free market players do not and never will have. While these powers are not capable of providing health care in an efficient manor, they can certainly be used to put free market competition out of business.
You've got to be kidding.
You've got to be kidding. Have you ever had to go up against a company like Cigna when they've denied your claim? Cigna won't go out of business if the American public is offered a choice for public insurance. They will have to change their practices and start being accountable to the people they are supposedly 'serving'.
Oh, and their CEO might have to take a small cut in his 26 million dollar a year salary.
> Could government
> Could government efficiencies
> lower health care costs?
Have you folks misplaced your calculators? Taxpayer-subsidized industries should ALWAYS provide cheaper alternatives to privately-run industries. As a result, privately-run industries are pushed to the margins and we LOSE efficiency. Health care costs will go UP, not DOWN.
These are a very, very legitimate concerns, and NCR's flippant dismissal of these concerns is astonishing. Do you truly want health care for all? Or do you simply want government-uber-alles, regardless of the consequences?
NCR's editorial standards have been slipping lately. I can't remember the last time I read a truly thoughtful analysis of an issue in your publication. Knee-jerk partisanship has never been a solution to anything. But that seems to be all NCR is offering these days.
Post new comment