NCR on Kindle - NCR classifieds - YouTube - Twitter - Facebook - Email Alerts - RSS
Mubarak may have planned attack on Christians, Catholic leader says
A Jan. 1 first bomb attack against Coptic Christians in Egypt which left 23 dead and almost a hundred wounded, widely blamed on Islamic fundamentalists, may have been orchestrated by an official in the former Mubarak regime in order to justify strengthening police controls, according to the head of the country’s Coptic Catholic church.
Cardinal Antonios Naguib, the Coptic Catholic Patriarch of Alexandria, floats that hypothesis in a new interview with the prestigious Italian Catholic publication 30 Giorni.
In the same interview, Naguib also warns that “diplomatic pressures, punitive initiatives or economic sanctions” from Western governments against Egypt in the name of defending the country’s Christians would constitute “the greatest harm that can be done to the Christians themselves.”
In general, Naguib says the anti-Mubarak protest movement was marked by tremendous solidarity between Muslims and Christians, and is hopeful about the prospects for building “a civil and democratic country based on laws.”
The Jan. 1 attack occurred just a few minutes into New Year’s Day, as Coptic Orthodox worshippers were participating in a midnight service at the Alexandria church of Saint Mark and Peter. Two weeks before the bombing an Islamist web site had called for attacks against Christian churches in Egypt, including the church that was struck on Jan. 1, and the Interior Ministry quickly blamed the Gaza-based “Army of Islam.”
President Hosni Mubarak delivered a nationally televised address in the wake of the bombing blaming “foreign fingers” for the attack.
Naguib, however, says there’s a long history of a connection between domestic anti-Mubarak agitation in Egypt and violence directed at Christians. In the 1980s and 1990s, he says, Christians were targeted by forces that wanted to bring down the regime, and when that failed, they began to attack the police and government officials.
In light of that history, Naguib suggests, security forces grew accustomed to using attacks on Christians as a pretext to clamp down on opposition movements – an Egyptian version of the “strategy of tension” long associated with police states.
“This has given weight to the hypothesis,” the Coptic Catholic leader says, “in circulation particularly among Christians, that the Minister of the Interior had planned the massacre of Alexandria to justify a strengthening of police controls.”
NCR: February 17-March 1, 2012
Subscribe to NCR to get all the news and special features that aren't always available online. In this issue:
- Conscience Roundup
Hear what theologians, commentators, and our editors have to say about the contraception mandate
- Special Section: Religious Life
Work of missioners, past and future; African meetings; and more
- Tribute to a Peacemaker
New York's Pax Christi fetes Daniel Berrigan
Naguib suggests that Mubarak’s Minister of the Interior, at the time Habib Ibrahim el-Adly, encouraged the attack as a way of proving that “his person was essential for the president and the regime.”
After Mubarak resigned, El-Adly was arrested and is reportedly facing charges of fraud, money laundering and for ordering that security forces fire on demonstrators during the early days of the protests.
The Jan. 1 attack triggered wide international protest, including remarks from Pope Benedict XVI calling for greater protection of religious minorities. That led the Mubarak regime to recall its ambassador to the Vatican, and Al-Azhar University, Egypt’s most prestigious Islamic institution, to suspend dialogue with the Vatican.
Naguib blamed “distorted” reporting of Benedict’s comments for those actions, saying that Al-Jazeera and other outlets suggested that the pope had called on Western governments to intervene in Egyptian affairs.
Asked about political efforts in the West to suspend economic and military aid to Egypt, as well as other countries where Christians are at risk, Naguib says “this attitude is wrong.”
“As Christians in Egypt – Catholic, Protestant and Orthodox, without differences – we see that any appeal to diplomatic pressures, punitive initiatives or to economic sanctions directed against Egypt, because of events that concern Egyptian Christians, is the greatest harm that can be done to the Christians themselves,” Naguib says.
In general, Naguib says the experience of the Egyptian uprising has offered hope for overcoming sectarian divisions.
“I am reassured by the fact of having seen something take place in these days that has not been seen for a long time: a concrete unity among the citizens, young and old, Christians and Muslims without distinction or discrimination,” he says.
“Now everyone sees that those who foment divisions and conflicts with other Egyptians on the basis of religious differences actually aim to destroy this unity and to destabilize Egypt.”
The full text of the 30 Giorni interview with Naguib can be found here.







John Allen, with his column
John Allen, with his column about zero tolerance for pedophile clergy and this column about Mubarak and Christianity, is stooping to tabloid journalism. No one writing for the Catholic Church, given its history, especially the currently running, horrendous sex scandal, has any right to infer or complain about about suspected religious clashes. After all, Benedict XVI has back-tracked on Vatican II ecumenical decisions even more than John Paul II. And the latter was bad enough.
Ah, John, It doesn't please
Ah, John,
It doesn't please me to see you dipping into the seminary/rectory gossip bucket. We look to you for the cold hard truth. Opining is allowed, but it has to come from a different place than wondering about what a deposed despot might or might not have thought. Don't you have a blog that you could use for this kind of stuff? It will take more than this to make me strop reading you. This piece is far from vintage John Allen.
If Patriarch Antonios Naguib
If Patriarch Antonios Naguib is correct in his suggestion,then once again we see how the political interests of authoritarian regimes trigger and then manipulate religious tensions as their regimes begin to crumble. As in Egypt so in Indonesia in the 1990s.
The series of host desecrations where Catholics are a majority in Eastern Indonesia,and the bombing of churches in Jawa where Christians are a minority, was instigated by the crumbling Soeharto military regime.
There is also another possible parallel. Just as the institutional Church in Indonesia from the Soeharto creeping coup (1965-1967)until the final years of his fascist regime (ended in chaos in 1998) clung to Soeharto's apron strings (fearing at first communism and then Islamists), so, apparently, the leadership of the Catholic communities in Egypt clug to Mubarak, even as his regime crumbled when the Patriarch apparently told Catholic protesters to go home. [At least in Indonesia, Catholics took a full part in the demontrations that accompanied Soeharto's downfall. The bishops had signed a very brave pastoral letter the year before - a 20 thousand copy reprint was made by N.U., the largest Muslim mass organisation.]
Why can't we cling to the gospel and support human dignity, freedom and democracy in the wider society and within our own Church? Yes, even as minority communities as in Egypt and Indonesia?
At this point this sounds
At this point this sounds like the same kind of 'hearsay' that confirmed weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. I don't see where this is worthwhile reporting except perhaps on a gossip page.
Nonsense. As a Copt, I'm
Nonsense. As a Copt, I'm saddened and sorry for these rumors that spread like wildfire without passing through the filter of even the most preliminary critical thinking. First of all, don't believe what's being propagated by mainstream media about Egyptian police brutality and so on. As an Egyptian, I can attest that the universally-vilified (and alas now largely disorganized to be almost dismantled thanks to recent events) Egyptian police in general, and Mr. El-Adly in particular, were a much-abhorred dread only to outlaws and terrorists, but never to ordinary, law-abiding, respectable citizens. Secondly, as to this particular rumor, the crux of it is that THE BRITISH POLICE (!!!) investigated it and found links that incriminate Mr. El-Adly. Now, as I've pointed out to my fellow Copts, the British police have no authority whatsoever to investigate incidents outside UK, no matter how big and tragic these incidents are to us. Secondly, even if they could, they would have never uncovered the truth in 2 or 3 weeks (and here I mention how the UN tribunal on the death of Lebanese PM Hariri is in its 6th year of investigation).
As I said, mere gossip and rumors.
Another instance of the
Another instance of the radical Islamic equation of "lying" as a form of truth and justice.
Thank you for keeping such a
Thank you for keeping such a close eye on Egypt. I have spent much of the last 2 years there and return there on Saturday for another week. The only reason I come to this site is your blog and I shall keep tuned from Cairo next week.
Post new comment