NCR on Kindle - NCR classifieds - YouTube - Twitter - Facebook - Email Alerts - RSS
Green Hell?
Sometimes it pays to listen to those who disagree with us. Spiritual director and writer Carol J. Meyer reviewed a new book for us -- Green Hell, written by Steve Milloy. Meyer does workshops and conferences in religious education, spirituality and personal development
Green Hell
How Environmentalists Plan to Control Your Life
and What You Can Do to Stop Them
By Steve Milloy
Regnery Publishing
Reviewed by Carol J. Meyer
Taking care of the earth seems like a no-brainer to me, so I was curious about what the opponents could have against it. Well, now I know. If Milloy is at all typical, it comes down to money and freedom. To him, the green movement is too expensive, and might interfere with our current affluent lifestyle, which must be preserved at all costs. And he doesn’t want any greens or government telling him what to do or how he should live.
Noticeably absent from his book and thinking is any sense that the earth is in trouble, so he sees green initiatives as ridiculous, or even dangerous. What he demonizes and presents as terrible, I laud and think, “Isn’t that great?” As he highlights the influence of environmental organizations, the EPA, and even businesses, I am heartened, while he is running scared. It never seems to occur to him that such wholescale acceptance of all things green might mean it’s an idea whose time has come. He still pushes against the tide.
Green Hell might seem convincing to the uncritical reader who never questions what the author left out. He touts the value of genetically-modified foods, DDT, offshore drilling, big cars, bottled water, etc. with no mention of their negative effects to the earth. He never mentions the realities or possibilities of diminishing resources, species extinction, pollution, deforestation, the increase of disease, shrinking oil reserves, plastics in the oceans, and more. I couldn’t detect any awareness of the connection of all life or a vision beyond what’s good for Americans in the short run.
Sarcasm and disdain feature prominently in Milloy’s writing. Never does he give the greens credit for trying to trying to come up with solutions, even if they’re not perfect yet. He uses extreme examples — like a woman spending $2,000 to clean up a chloroflourocarbons — to discredit the whole green enterprise. A little more respect, openness, and seeking of common ground could serve him, and all of us, well.
I found the book fascinating (as in, “Wow, he really thinks like this!”) and interesting, even if I didn’t agree with the author’s conclusions. I’d encourage you to read it because: 1) It’s filled with facts and specifics, and you’ll learn a lot; the author has done his homework 2) You’ll get a broader perspective and see clearly the anti-environmentalists’ concerns 3) You’ll learn about the green progress being made and 4) You’ll see the inconsistencies and faults of the green movement, which hopefully will inspire humility, self-examination, and correction efforts.
In the end, it all comes down to whether you think the Earth is in trouble or not. If so, the green revolution, regulations, changes, expenses are all small prices to pay for saving the very source of ongoing life. If not — as Milloy believes -- all this green business is a misguided conspiracy to diminish our lives and control us, and we need to fight against it. Green hell or green heaven — which one is it?





I was taught that free will
I was taught that free will was the ability to choose the greater good over the more immediate good. That higher intellectual process does not seem to be present with Mr. Milloy or others like him.
Free will allows one to use
Free will allows one to use reason to choose good from folly, Choosing immediate good is always better than some vague undefined and nonproven future "greater good". In fact history is full of examples where an elite ruling class drags out the "greater good" argument and proceeds to dictate to the masses think communism,nazism, and contemporary socialism. All seek to manipulate public opinion towards a rigid belief system and denigrate and eventually criminalize those that dissent. Climate change alarmism is yet another form of this behavior and just as delusional based on junk science and chicken little thinking. Naturaly its proponents require a large strong central government to enforce their opinions. This could only happen if politicians are seduced by the increased taxes that a cowed populace would be willing to fork over in order to save themselves from inpending climate change doom (something Gore figured out years ago). Not that mankind can do anything to control mother nature, but that is beside the point. All that is needed is to convince himself that he can. So it boils down to the peoples fate resting in the hands of elected officials at a time when we have lived beyond our means and a there is great need to raise taxes. Can anyone guess what will happen next?
The earth is not in trouble.
The earth is not in trouble. Much of environmentalism is hysteria.
Yes, well reasoned,
Yes, well reasoned, scientificially sound, factually supported hysteria.
Stephan: The Earth is not in
Stephan: The Earth is not in nearly as much trouble as it was forty years ago, thanks to the efforts of environmentalists. You're welcome.
All the environmentalists I
All the environmentalists I know are calm, reasonable people. What basis do you have for saying much of environmentalism is hysteria? You don't know the emotional state of billions of people. Such a caricature of caring people is entirely false and has no part in sincere dialogue.
Perhaps the issue is not so
Perhaps the issue is not so much that we need to "save the earth", but that all the resources we have on this earth are gifts from our Creator to be shared with our fellow humans, not squandered by the rich and powerful. How best can we use our gifts for the good of all humankind?
Post new comment