NCR on Kindle - NCR classifieds - YouTube - Twitter - Facebook - Email Alerts - RSS
Beatification Q&A #2: What’s the deal with miracles?
ROME -- In one way or another, miracles have always been part of the sainthood process.
Well before the Catholic church had a formal system of canonization, grassroots devotions to saints were usually premised both on someone’s reputation for personal holiness and their wonder-working power. By the 16th century, a candidate for sainthood who wasn’t a martyr had to have a “reputation for sanctity and miracles” in order to be beatified, and at least two more miracles had to be documented before canonization. John Paul dropped the number to one miracle for beatification and one more for canonization, but the requirement remains.
The logic is straight-forward: When the church declares someone a saint, it means she or he is already in Heaven. A miracle, worked in response to a request made in prayer, is seen as confirmation that the person is indeed in Heaven and capable of interceding with God. (That’s why the miracles have to come after the candidate’s death. Although Roman lore is full of anecdotes about prodigious deeds associated with John Paul II during his lifetime, none of that satisfied the posthumous requirement.)
Think of the miracle, in other words, as God’s seal of approval on the candidate.
In theory, the miracle could be any act of divine intervention. For instance, when the Croatian nun Marija Petković was beatified in 2003, her miracle concerned a lieutenant on a Peruvian submarine sunk by a Japanese fishing trawler in 1988. According to a church investigation, the lieutenant prayed for Petković’s help and was granted superhuman strength that allowed him to open a hatch against several thousands of pounds of water pressure, saving the lives of 22 crewmen.
In most cases, however, the miracles studied for purposes of beatification and canonization involve healings from illness. Those healings are examined by consulters to the Vatican’s Congregation for the Causes of Saints, both a panel of medical experts and a panel of theologians.
According to the traditional criteria, for a healing to be certified as miraculous, it must be:
- Immediate
- Complete
- Permanent
- Scientifically inexplicable
John Paul II always had a sense of theatre, and thus it’s only fitting that the miracle which sealed his beatification has a poetic arc. It involves the healing of a 49-year-old French nun named Marie Simon-Pierre Normand, who belongs to an order called the Institut des Petites Soeurs des Maternités Catholiques (“Institute of the Little Sisters of Catholic Motherhood”).
NCR: February 17-March 1, 2012
Subscribe to NCR to get all the news and special features that aren't always available online. In this issue:
- Conscience Roundup
Hear what theologians, commentators, and our editors have to say about the contraception mandate
- Special Section: Religious Life
Work of missioners, past and future; African meetings; and more
- Tribute to a Peacemaker
New York's Pax Christi fetes Daniel Berrigan
The poetry is that Normand suffered from Parkinson’s disease, the same ailment that afflicted John Paul himself. In fact, Normand has said that when she was in the grip of the disease, she found it painful to watch John Paul on television, because she saw a glimpse of her own future – progressive loss of control over her body and a life confined to a wheelchair.
According to accounts given by Normand, she had been diagnosed with an aggressive form of Parkinson’s disease in 2001, which meant that instead of gradually getting worse over many years, she deteriorated rapidly. When Benedict XVI announced the opening of a beatification cause for John Paul II on May 13, 2005, members of Normand’s community in both France and Africa began praying to the late pope for her recovery.
By that time, Normand said, she intended to resign from her position in charge of a large staff at a maternity hospital, and she even despaired of her ability to make a trip to Lourdes to pray for a cure.
As Normand told the story in a 2010 interview with the Italian state TV network RAI, on the night of June 2, 2005, she told her superior of her intention to resign, who suggested that she pray anew to John Paul II. Normand said the superior suggested that she write the pope’s name on a piece of paper, which by that stage she normally couldn’t do because of tremors in her hands. The superior insisted, suggesting that the left-handed Normand use her right hand, and she complied. That night, she said, she was able to sleep well, despite the fact that the pain of the disease usually kept her awake.
The next morning, she said, she awoke feeling much greater movement in her body, and went directly to pray before the Blessed Sacrament. She said she prayed the “luminous mysteries” of the rosary (a new devotion introduced by John Paul II in 2002). Afterwards, she said, she went to the regular morning Mass with the other sisters, where she became convinced she was cured. Four days later she had a regularly scheduled appointment with her neurologist, who, she said, was amazed by the complete disappearance of her symptoms.
In March 2010, media reports briefly implied that Normand had fallen ill again and that at least one physician had questioned the original diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease, suggesting it may have been some other nervous disorder which can go into spontaneous remission. Those rumors were swiftly denied by the French bishops’ conference, however, and the Vatican obviously resolved any doubts to its satisfaction.
One advantage of beatifications and canonizations which come quickly is that most of the people who loomed large in the candidate’s life are still around. That’s certainly true with John Paul II, including his miracolata, an Italian word literally meaning “miracled one,” and referring to the person who experienced the candidate’s miracle. In true 21st century fashion, interviews with Normand are even available on YouTube.
Sr. Marie Simon-Pierre will be very much in evidence in Rome this week, among other things offering her testimony during a vigil ceremony Saturday evening in the Circus Maximus. She’ll be joined by two of John Paul II’s closest aides: Cardinal Stanislaw Dziwisz of Krakow, Poland, his longtime private secretary; and Spanish layman Joaquin Navarro-Valls, John Paul’s spokesperson.
More postings:
Beatification Q&A #1: What's the Rush?
Beatification Q&A #2: What’s the deal with miracles?
[John L. Allen Jr. is NCR senior correspondent. He can be reached at jallen@ncronline.org.]
Editor's Note: We can send you an e-mail alert every time John Allen's column, "All Things Catholic," is posted to NCRonline.org. Go to this page and follow the directions: E-mail alert sign-up. If you already receive e-mail alerts from us, click on the "update my profile" button to add "All Things Catholic" to your list.
More NCR coverage of the beatification of John Paul II
Maureen Fiedler: Beatifications and Politics
Michael Baxter: Biography of JPII raises questions about partiality
John L. Allen Jr.: In death as in life, John Paul a sign of contradiction
Gerald Slevin John Paul beatification highlights dysfunctional monarchy
John Allen's Beatification Q&As
#1: What's the Rush?
#2: What’s the deal with miracles?
#3: Why make saints out of popes?
#4: What’s the Divine Mercy connection?







"One advantage of
"One advantage of beatifications and canonizations which come quickly is that most of the people who loomed large in the candidate’s life are still around."
Yes, some of THEM certainly are:
http://www.facebook.com/posted.php?id=247147078862
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHyhdaTQCS4
http://www.amazon.com/Vows-Silence-Abuse-Power-Papacy/dp/product-descrip...
Memo to Mr. Allen:
Nice HAGIOGRAPHICAL pom poms!
One of the historical
One of the historical purposes of canonization is to help the faithful distinguish between people who loved God and gave others hope, and those who live to tear everyone else down. The former are recognized as saints, the latter as cynics whom history will soon forget.
Esteban, it seems to me what
Esteban, it seems to me what you are suggesting is that we only look at the positive aspect of JP11's life. That is not a balance view and as a result one that is not proper in reviewing a candidate for sainthood. I don't think that it is fair to dismiss others who insist that the negative is examined as well as the positive. I look a all of his live and find a man of deep contradictions; insightful/blind, open/close, warm/cold. I also believe that, while he did give hope, he only gave some of God's children hope and kicked too many others to the curb.
JPII, we young adults love
JPII, we young adults love you! Thank you for your witness in an authentic search for truth and noble love.
The "convenience" of the
The "convenience" of the immediate papal succession of Benedict XVI to JohnPaul II is analogous to that of Leo XIII succeeding Pius IX. (Read the book: "Prisoner of the Vatican," David I. Kertzer.) Under threat of losing his Kingdom, the Papal States, Pius IX pressured to have the First Vatican Council declare Papal Infallibility thinking to reinforce his moral/political authority and make the Italian Government think twice before stripping him of his Kingdom.
When the Papal States were lost, the Pope lost the Land over which he was also secular king. After the death of Pius IX, Leo XIII took up the fight to retain the Papal States, but to no avail. Leo XIII ultimately moved on and took up the mission of Church in service to the poor, the Gospel of Peace and Justice.
Benedict XVI, successor to JohnPaul II, perhaps thinks the fight of JohnPaul II against Liberation Theology might fail and that canonizing him might morally/politically strengthen "the cause." Liberation Theology "ain't" the Papal States. It's part and parcel of the Gospel of Peace and Justice. The Papal States are history — Liberation Theology is history-in-the-making; it has a future, whether or not Pope Benedict XVI pushes the canonization of JohnPaul II.
The beatification of John
The beatification of John Paul II is more than enshrining his holiness' opposition to Liberation Theology but also his questionable stances on many other things. Pope Bennedict XVI knows the system well --- something John Allen just can't bring himself to explain. The Vatican and Catholic conservatives/traditionalists will say that "God approved everything JPII did." Some things won't be enshrined forever, but as the church works they will be for "a long time."
This process is moving too
This process is moving too fast and should be delayed. Only God can really determine if someone is a saint. This is another move by the conservative vatican to try to get people to forget about the sexual scandal which is causing great pain in the church worldwide.
"Only God can really
"Only God can really determine if someone is a saint".
You are absolutely correct. That's why a miracle is required, see? Please go back and read the article again.
Author Bill Briggs' book, The
Author Bill Briggs' book, The Third Miracle, is a good layperson's guide to the
subject of miracle recognition and a pretty good story as well. It should be noted, however,
that the order of nuns, whose founder is the one whose story of canonization is
told, disproved of Mr. Briggs' approach for seemingly overly concentrating on the financial
cost of the process. I suggest you read the book and judge for yourself.
"In March 2010, media reports
"In March 2010, media reports briefly implied that Normand had fallen ill again and that at least one physician had questioned the original diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease, suggesting it may have been some other nervous disorder which can go into spontaneous remission. Those rumors were swiftly denied by the French bishops’ conference, however, and the Vatican obviously resolved any doubts to its satisfaction."
John, in an otherwise balanced piece, you neglected to mention JP II's abolition of the office of "Devil's Advocate". Given that the finality of the cure and the original diagnosis are in question, who, if anyone, is there to stand astride the railroad tracks and throw his/her hands forward to try to stop this train from running off the cliff further down the tracks?
I find it amazing that those who endorsed JP II's blanket statement that women can't be ordained priests because sacred tradition demands only men be ordained so casually stood aside while JP II altered a process that had stood for well over a thousand years.
No amazement necessary if one
No amazement necessary if one recognizes the difference between dogma and discipline.
So I am to believe that the
So I am to believe that the creation of "saints" to be called upon to intercede for those of us on Earth and the method by which this designation is accomplished is not dogma? I know quite a few Southern Baptists who would take umbrage with your assessment.
Well, what about Mother's
Well, what about Mother's Theresa's miracle who actually died soon after the alleged cure? All she really experienced was some temporary relief from pain; she was not cured. That's a pretty low grade miracle! And this French nun may just be in remission. With cancer victims you usually have to wait 5 years to determine if the person is not just in remission but actually cured. Parkinsons is not cancer but it is similar.
MIRACLES ARE AN INTERESTING
MIRACLES ARE AN INTERESTING THING if there are miracles. It always amazes me that God never regrows limbs as a miracle. No sight has been restored to the blind since Jesus, nor has anyone dead walked out of a tomb or a leper cured. The only miracles that God apparently deals with now are vague cases of internal disease or psychosis that can have several explanations or no explanation.
"In March 2010, media reports
"In March 2010, media reports briefly implied that Normand had fallen ill again and that at least one physician had questioned the original diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease....those rumors were swiftly denied by the French bishops’ conference, however, and the Vatican obviously resolved any doubts to its satisfaction."
How did they resolve it?
Something is fishy here..... I would like to see a peer reviewed evaluation of this miracle. If she doesn't stay cured or in remission but succumbs then the Vatican has made the Church look foolish and doesn't it nullify the beatification?
If I were Sr Marie Simon Pierre I would be nervous, if her symptoms were to return she could suffer from a "unexpected heart attack" before the word got out like John Paul One.
Institut des Petites Soeurs
Institut des Petites Soeurs des Maternités Catholiques (“Institute of the Little Sisters of Catholic Motherhood”).
------------------------------------------------------------------
"La Maternité" also means a pregnancy and birth facility: e.g. maternity clinic, ward, hospital. That seems to be the implication of the plural in the name of Sister Marie's order, and the fact that she was working in a maternity hospital.
Within the spiritual worldview of the living praying to saints to intercede with God for a miracle, there are still some problems with even the best attested of miracles. How do we know that the miracle occurred because of the intercession of that particular purported saint? How do we know that it came from God and not from the devil, to trick us?
Post new comment