The beginning of change is the moment of doubt

“I have doubts! I have such doubts!”

So lamented Sister Aloysius in the final line of the play and film Doubt. She had just learned that Father Flynn, the parish priest that she suspected to be abusing children, whom she had tried so hard to remove, had been appointed pastor of another parish with a large school.

Sister Aloysius’ unshakable certainty about things as various as the evils of ballpoint pens, the corrupting power of puberty, or the dangers of using secular song in Christmas pageants, dominates the entire show. So it is quite jarring, in the end, to see her so profoundly wounded, bent over with grief, and seeking consolation.

Of course, she does not doubt her conviction about Father Flynn. She doubts the power of truth over lies; she doubts the triumph of wholeness over harm. She doubts her vocation to serve a church that may not practice from the same moral high ground that it compels its followers to live by, a church that would sooner protect its clergy through complacency and secrecy than protect its children through honesty and accountability.

However we feel about Sister Aloysius’ rigidity and fierceness, it is hard not to feel compassion for her at this moment. Many of us, no doubt, can relate to her. Her church has broken her heart. She has fought to protect the children in her school (children with whom she herself was hardly gentle!), and her questions were ignored, her concerns never considered. Even with all of her devotion to her school, she is powerless to protect them from the church to which she has consecrated her life.

In many ways, Sister Aloysius is like Thomas, perhaps the most famous doubter of all.

Thomas has been given a bad rap throughout the ages. “Doubting Thomas” seems to be that lesser disciple who couldn’t believe when everyone else did. But if you look at the “Doubting Thomas” text in John’s Gospel, and the narratives about the appearances of the resurrected Jesus that precede it, we see that all of the disciples had their doubts after the crucifixion.

How couldn’t they? The embodiment of love, justice, compassion and healing had just been brutally beaten, humiliated and executed like a common criminal. What happened to the “kingdom of God is at hand?” Is this the “more abundant life” that Jesus promised? Was it all just rhetoric, a delusion, a lie? How couldn’t the disciples lose hope and get caught up in sorrow and doubt?

Subscribe to NCR

Want to read more about important issues in the life of the Church? A subscription to NCR will keep you up to date and informed.

Subscribe now!

Thomas, unlike most of the disciples, wasn’t in the upper room when Jesus’ resurrected body made an appearance. When the disciples tell him about it, he says that he will not believe until he actually gets to touch the wounds of Jesus. A week later, Jesus reappears in the room. Incredibly, he does not shame Thomas. Instead, Jesus encourages him to touch the wounds. But Thomas doesn’t need to. Just seeing Jesus and his wounds is enough.

The real power in the story comes in Thomas’ confession of faith: “My Lord and My God!” These words constitute lot more than an exclamation. They demonstrate deep faith and understanding of Jesus’ true nature as the incarnate God. Very few disciples utter such powerful words in John’s Gospel, but interestingly, they usually only do it after moments of profound doubt.

It’s not hard to relate to Sister Aloysius or Thomas. How often have we responded to moments of pain, illness, betrayal, suffering and abandonment with doubt? How often do we question our commitment to the reform of our church? How often do we wonder if it’s worth all of the struggle and disappointment?

Of course, the disciples were lucky. They actually got to see that Jesus did indeed rise. They get real, physical proof that Jesus’ promises of new life were realities, not just words.

This is why these resurrection stories are so important to the Gospel writers. They knew that those seekers -- like you and me -- who would read the Gospels years later would not have such certainty. They would not have the opportunity to literally encounter the resurrected Jesus. John is wise to remind of us Jesus’ words, “Blessed are those who have not seen, but believed.”

Our task then, is to find the ways in which we do and can experience the resurrection. We know that we experience much pain and death, but when is our suffering transformed so that we also experience new, more abundant life and wholeness? What can possibly give us hope when all seems so doubtful?

To help us answer this question, I think that Jesus gave us a good clue when he shows the disciples, and then later Thomas, his wounds.

There is a great Jewish belief called Tikkun Olam. Tikkun means “repair” and olam means “world.” The Jews understand well that the world is a shattered place. Our highest calling, therefore, is to help repair it. We are called to create healing in places where there are deep wounds. We are called to bring wholeness and resurrection to those places where there is destruction and death. In these most vulnerable places lies the deepest and most authentic power for new creation.

Once the disciples receive these visits from the resurrected Jesus, their doubts are transformed into faith. Jesus breaths on them, the same way that God breathed on Adam at the creation of human beings. The disciples are literally re-created in this moment. Their brokenness is repaired. Their newfound wholeness gives them courage to leave the locked room of doubt and fear, so that they can begin the work of repairing the shattered world outside.

John Patrick Shanley, the author of Doubt, writes in the preface to the play: “It is Doubt (so often experienced initially as weakness) that changes things. The beginning of change is the moment of Doubt. It is that crucial moment when we renew our humanity or become a lie.”

There are endless opportunities to transform our struggles with doubt into an opportunity for repairing the world. These are invitations from God to create greater wholeness in our community. In doing so, we are often re-created ourselves, too.

The Gospel story that reaches its climax with the paradoxical mocking and execution of God incarnate concludes with an equally powerful paradox: Doubt is not weakness, but rather, an invitation to touch wounds. Because in these most vulnerable places lives our most powerful opportunity to breathe more abundant life into our afflicted church and world.

[Jamie L. Manson received her Master of Divinity degree from Yale Divinity School where she studied Catholic theology and sexual ethics. Her columns for NCR earned her a first prize Catholic Press Association award for Best Column/Regular Commentary in 2010.]

Editor's Note: We can send you an e-mail alert every time Jamie Manson's column, "Grace on the Margins", is posted to NCRonline.org. Go to this page and follow directions: E-mail alert sign-up. If you already receive e-mail alerts from us, click on the "update my profile" button to add "Grace on the Margins" to your list.

God bless you! Your deep and

God bless you!

Your deep and inspiring meditation brought tears into my eyes. I've not been so moved for a long, long time. I'm not able to say more than: God bless you!

In the play, all Sister had

In the play, all Sister had was doubt. Yet she attempted to destroy the pastor's career, his life, based on her doubt. Not evidence, just suspicions. That's the biggest problem with the entire sexual abuse crisis, there is rarely, if ever, any objective proof; rather there is an alleged victim's word against the accused priest. Perhaps there is circumstantial evidence, "evidence" that would never result in a conviction in a court of law. Simply suspicion and "credible" (believable) accusations.

Not enough to ruin a priest. Not enough by far.

Clint, do you alone deny the

Clint, do you alone deny the reality of the clerical abuse of our children?

Can there really be any doubt at all?

You have expressed no doubt about the bombing of Hiroshima, or of the evil (for you) of labor unions (both positions in dissent from the Vatican), and now you have no doubt about the purity of our priests, again dissenting from Rome?

Do you lack not only doubt, but shame?

Why is Jamie so sure Sister

Why is Jamie so sure Sister had no doubts about the priest's guilt? She has given us her own interpretation and treated it as fact. Jung said that the person capable of starting World War III would be a type A extravert incapable of doubt. And so, the good Sister used her infallible certitude coupled with her great personal power and her threat to continue the crusade to drive a man out of his parish because he knew he would never be able to defend himself.

The priest abuse scandal brought out some real vultures. But there has been a certain amount of collateral damage which might not trouble Jamie at all. I consider the case of a good priest friend of mine: Father X,age 77. For years,it has been his custom to hold hands with the servers during the community recitation of the Our Father. It has been my custom, as well. A father--home schooler and harsh disciplinarian--was suspicious about the way Father X was holding his son's hand. The father confronted Fr. X. What he should have done was gone down on his knees in a puddle of repentance and said, "Oh, I'm so sorry, sir. I didn't realize I was giving that impression, I'm so sorry. I'm so sorry. Here are my apologies. Do I need to apologize to your son?" But instead, Fr. X got mad because it all seemed so silly.

And so the indignant father went to the bishop. Without a hearing, Father X was slapped with a suspension from the privilege of publicly saying Mass or administering sacraments. "A serious matter," the bishop said.

My reaction and the reaction of most of my brother priests? The bishop is my enemy. He will never give me the benefit of the doubt. The lay people are my enemy. And I will not touch one of their children with a ten foot pole.

Happy vocation day. Don't count on me recommending this job to anybody.

In the real world, (not in

In the real world, (not in the play) suspicions led to the evidence, to the victims and to the punishment, sometimes so soft, of the abusive priests.

The sexual abuse scandal is not, it was not, a "suspicion".
Maybe the sister in the play didn't have the evidences to verify her suspicions, but nobody in the church tried to search for them. Maybe there were cases of accusations that were not proved and ruined a few priests lives. Sorry for them. God knows their truth. We are all limited.

But the abuses happened in reality, unfortunately. It is a public and Vatican accepted knowledge by now. It happened around the world.

Let's not try to defend the indefensible.
Let's pray for the falsely accused. May God's mercy and compassion help them.

Jamie, I always find your

Jamie,
I always find your columns to be very insightful and profound, to say the least. I look forward to reading them. Keep doubting; keep praying; keep speaking the truth.

AGAIN, JAMIE, YOU ARE ON A

AGAIN, JAMIE, YOU ARE ON A ROLL. NO AXE-GRINDING HERE. GOOD JOB ON DOUBT.
JOHN MANAHAN

John Patrick Shanley's play

John Patrick Shanley's play "Doubt" still leaves us uncertain about Fr. Flynn's guilt or innocence regarding child molestation, or whatever he may or may not be guilty of. Sr. Aloyisius firm conviction is shaken; she's not so sure anymore. She had to resort to deception to get rid of Fr. Flynn. There is doubt throughout the play about everything. That was the whole point.

This is one of the best

This is one of the best insights I've seen in a long time. Thanks!!!

You know, of course, that the

You know, of course, that the "doubt" in the film was also directed at the Principal and her personal quest to discredit the priest. In the end, each of them doubted that they had done what was right.

Totally authentic. Definitely

Totally authentic. Definitely full of grace.

As the Church has to change, and go through transformation, doubts and struggles are hard.

Good writing!

An interesting point, yes,

An interesting point, yes, but your analysis of the movie and play "Doubt" is not accurate. As has already been pointed out above, the doubt of the title applies on multiple levels. It is not the case that Sister Aloysius knows for certain anything about the priest but rather goes on a crusade to have him removed. The whole thing rests on the moral ambiguity of the nun despite her own conviction of moral clarity. The presence of the conflict between the nun and institution that you attempt to throw up here is inaccurate and misleading.

Some things troubled me about

Some things troubled me about the priest's behavior. The incident when he went into the mother superior's office and took her chair behind her desk, leaving her to sit in a straight chair in front of the desk, was a tacky, ham-handed way of expressing his authority. Now, in the pre Vatican II grade school I attended this would have been unacceptable. He was attempting to "put her in her place." He was the boss. There was always great difference, and usually great respect, between the pastor and the nuns. His actions told me he was telling her, in so many words, that she was nothing more than the hired help.

The dinner scene, where the pastor was entertaining some fellow priests, left a subtle sense of disgust in me. The platter of roast beef, so rare, the meet was blood red with blood in the platter around the beef, and the pastor indulging himself in liberal portions of beef and red wine, struck me as boarding on gluttony.

And the incident of the pastor secretly placing the under shirt of the boy in his foot locker, though not conclusive, was certainly out of the ordinary. Such actions would leave any nun with years of running a Catholic school to question.

The young nun with her childhood perception of a priest, by the very nature of his office, being elevated halfway between heaven and earth, left her questioning the older nun's intentions. It reminds me of my catechism classes in grade school where the nuns always emphasized that a priest was like a traffic cop directing traffic. You respect him and the office he represents, but not necessarily the individual. You respect the uniform and his job, but not necessarily the man. I always wondered why the nuns stressed that so much when I was a child. Now, I know.

Another point I forgot to

Another point I forgot to mention was when the mother superior told the pastor she had talked to someone in his previous parish, and he asked if she had talked to the pastor there, and she replied, "No, a nun at the parish school." That took the fight out of him, and he went quietly. That tells us all.

The meaning I took away from

The meaning I took away from Doubt is far different than the one Ms. Manson expressed in this column. I thought doubt was rife through out the play. The play's author deliberately choose not to reveal had happened between the young boy and the priest - thus insuring that each audience member would be left to grapple with doubt.

"Doubt is not the absence of

"Doubt is not the absence of faith; it is the precursor to it."

Otherwise what one has is certitude and that encapsulates the individual into a box from which futher insights are impossible to obtain. No room for the Holy Spirit to breathe new life.

Wonderful article. Thank you, Jamie, for your profound writing and witness.

Post new comment

NCR Comment code:

  1. Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Use appropriate language. Avoid vulgarities and slurs.
  3. Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.

For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
(if you have one; if not, leave this blank)
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <font> <swf> <swf list>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is to prove you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.