The Holy See’s Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace has issued this morning a new document dealing with the global financial crisis. It is bound to cause a stir and I suspect Mr. George Weigel is already looking for his red and gold pens to tell us what we can ignore and what we must follow in the current text. (He will be disappointed: There is next to nothing in this document that will cause Weigel to get out his gold pen!)
This morning's Washington Post has a front page story on what it calls Sen. Marco Rubio's "embellishment" of his family's history. Rubio has previously, and on many occasions, said that his parents fled Cuba after Castro's revolution when, in fact, they came to the U.S. in 1956. The article correctly notes that those Cubans who fled Castro had a cache and that those who came before were often viewed with suspicion, so mixing up the dates would have served Rubio's political career.
Frank Foer at The New Republic raises some hard-headed questions about the Occupy Wall Street protests. I share his concerns about the practical political effects of the protests. All it takes is one moral idiot wearing a Che Guevara tee-shirt and an Obama button to make a devastating attack ad. (And, yes, if you wear a Che Guevara tee-shirt, you are a moral idiot.)
There is a Romanticism about much of the commentary regarding these protests. I am suspicious of Romanticism per se. It is fine, even uplifting, to listen to five minutes of Wagner, but if you listen to five hours, you are going to think about invading Poland.
Ignorance is not bliss, at least not if you're part of the 70 percent of Republicans who can’t bring yourself to develop a mad crush on Mitt Romney. It is an almost daily occurrence that one of the other candidates demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of a critical issue. This is a big problem for the GOP.
I know, I know. The Pope is the special guardian and promoter of the unity of the entire Church. Consequently, I have no objection to his efforts to reach out to the Lefebvrist schimsatics and try to get them to return to the fold.
But their leader, Richard Williamson, has recently repeated his belief that the Jews are collectively responsible for the crime of deicide, a claim specifically rejected by the Second Vatican Council and every Pontiff since. Of course, this is one of Williamson's problems with Vatican II. But, really, when one is so aggressively anti-Semitic, the question must be posed: Why do we want these hateful people back?
The new Prime Minister of Libya has announced that Moammar Qaddafi was killed in fighting around the city of Sirte.
The Public Religion Research Institute has a useful primer on American attitudes towards Mormonism and the role of Mormons in public life.
What jumps off the page is that while many Americans (72 percent), especially white evangelicals (81 percent), view Mormons as holding religious views different from their own, 67 percent of all Americans and 66 percent of all white evangelicals view Mormons favorably. Pastor Jeffress has his work cut out for him.
The data also looks at how these broader attitudes relate specifically to Gov. Mitt Romney's campaign for the presidency.
Good stuff from the good people at PRRI.
The GOP has been complaining that President Obama’s plan to pay for his jobs bill by instituting a surtax on those who make more than one million dollars per year amounts to “class warfare.” But, in fact, it is the GOP that is engaging in class warfare.
It is sad to see the once prestigious journal, First Things, turn into a mouthpiece for extremist, crackpot conspiracy theories peddled by those who attack the Catholic Campaign for Human Development. But, they have an article up by Father Val Peter that repeats some of the baseless charges leveled against the bishops' anti-poverty program. It is indicative of Peter's bias, intentional or not, that he repeatedly leaves out the first "C" for "Catholic" in the acronym that identifies CCHD.
Two lines caused me especial distress. Peter writes: "Unfortunately, the pastoral needs of today are very different from what they were forty years ago. Rather than change with them, the CHD [sic] has mutated into irrelevance."
I almost feel sorry for Pastor Robert Jeffress of the First Baptist Church of Dallas, but I shall resist that feeling. Jeffress ignited a firestorm by calling Mormonism a "cult" and arguing that it is better to support a "Christian" for political office than a non-Christian.
In an op-ed in this morning's Washington Post, Jeffress argues confusedly about the role of religion in politics. For example, he writes, "While I prefer a competent Christian over a competent non-Christian, religion is not the only consideration in choosing a candidate. Frankly, Christians have not always made good presidents. We must also consider whether a candidate is competent to lead and govern according to biblical principles." Funny, I missed that article in the Constitution about biblical principles.