Over at Huffington Post, I have an article today about Mitt Romney's debt to Jerry Falwell. Falwell relied on Francis Schaeffer's theory on "co-belligerancy" to overcome his traditional fundamentalist Baptist aversion to being "yoked" with un-believers, paving the way for fundamentalists to form political coalitions with conservative Catholics, Mormons and others.
What a day! If you are a political junkie like me, yesterday will be tough to top. From the pre-dawn news from Des Moines that Mr. Romney actually did not win the Iowa caucuses, to the interview with Gingrich’s ex-wife, to the news that Perry was dropping out of the race and endorsing Gingrich, to the fireworks in last night’s debate, it was difficult to stay on top of the news. As I went to bed last night, I thought – how am I going to digest all this in the morning for the blog? I thought a good night’s sleep would help but such an agitated day produced an agitated sleep and I awoke at 3 a.m. and tossed and turned for a couple of hours before resigning myself to the fact that I was not going to be able to go back to sleep.
The homepage at Politico has several commentaries of Rick Perry's decision to quit the race and even more on one of Newt Gingrich's ex-wives' interview with ABC, but not a single item on the most important news of the day: The number of new jobless claims fell again last week to the lowest level since April 2008.
And, as Jonathan Cohn notes over at TNR, the unemployment rate in Michigan dropped to its lowest rate since September 2008. To be sure, at 9.3%, Michigan's jobless rate is still too high. But if the unemployment rate in key swing states, and nationally, continues to move in the right direction, the GOP will have a hard time arguing that President Obama's policies have failed. In Michigan, where Obama's decision to bailout the auto industry played a big role in stabilizing the economy, a decision Mitt Romney opposed, the case will be well nigh to impossible to make.
E.J. Dionne looks at the reasons why the Tea Party's push to craft a variety of GOP populism has hit the skids. EJ wrote his column before the news that the most aggressive populist in the race, Rick Perry, was dropping out and throwing his support behind Newt Gingrich, who practices a kind of populism of his own, but his argument makes sense: The GOP can always find a way to live with "a Harvard-educated private-equity specialist" like Mitt Romney.
Yesterday, I commented on an article at The New Republic by Michael Kazin that I thought misunderstood the influence of the Religious Right in GOP politics.
Why do I love TNR? Because it is not afraid to publish conflicting articles on consecutive days.
Let us set aside the environmental issue of whether or not the extraction of oil sands is too dirty, and too energy intensive a process, to make sense. If Canada wants to extract petroleum in such a fashion, that is their business.
The question the President faced was whether or not to build a new pipeline to bring the oil so extracted to refineries on the Gulf Coast. That proposed pipeline would have passed through what is known as the Ogallala Aquifer, which supplies water to much of the Great Plains. One accident, and the result could be devastating. Ask yourselves this: Do you like grabbing a burger at McDonald's every once in awhile? A poisoned aquifer could result in no corn, and no corn means no beef, and no beef means no burgers.
Poor Mitt Romney. No, that adjective is inexact. The one thing he has never been, poor, is now a source of contention as he seeks to lock up the GOP nomination with a win in Saturday’s South Carolina primary and his challengers have been focusing on his mountains of money.
Mark Silk at Spiritual Politics takes note of Newt Gingrich's comments regarding the necessity of preventing sharia law from being recognized by U.S. courts. Silk invites Newt to engage in a thought-experiment: substitute "halakha" for "sharia." Silk might also mention the canon law of the Catholic Church. Civil courts rely on religious laws all the time when called upon to adjudicate a case involving a given religion. How could it be otherwise? Gingrich is simply engaging in anti-Muslim baiting. It is ugly. It is beneath a man of his intellect. But, that doesn't mean it won't be effective.
The always intelligent Nate Silver at the New York Times raises doubts about the theory that Mitt Romney is essentially unacceptable to the vast majority of Republican primary voters, and that his wins in Iowa and New Hampshire were simply the result of the conservative vote being split among Gingrich, Santorum and Perry.
Silver is half-right: Many Republicans will support whoever is the eventual nominee and while they may prefer someone other than Romney, they will climb on board his bandwagon if he continues to rack up victories.
Kenneth Pollack, director of the Saban Center at Brookings, is a very intelligent analyst of all things having to do with the Mideast. This morning he has a very smart, and therefore very troubling, article at TNR about the drumbeat of war regarding Iran. There are not a lot of good options regarding Iran to be sure, but war is the worst option.