The Catholic Health Association today released the text of its "comment" to the Department of Health and Human Services regarding the HHS mandate and the need for improved consceince exemptions. I will be writing more on this tomorrow. In the meantime, make sure you check out the text of the letter -- signed by Sr. Carol Keehan, CEO of CHA, and Robert Stanek, Board Chair of CHA -- at NCR Today.
Greg Metzger has a post up in which he looks at Bishop Fabian Bruskewitz's ridiculous, and ridiculously prejudicial, question at the USCCB meeting on Wednesday, in which Bruskewitz asked if Muslims were completely exempt from the Affordable Care Act, which the bishop refered to as "Obamacare." Metzger was disappointed in the lack of an immediate, forceful response from Abp Lori and President Garvey. If you have been to one of these USCCB meetings, you know that they contradict each other in the gentlest of ways, and I am not as put out by Lori's and Garvey's response as Metzger was.
And, at Commonweal, Mollie Wilson O'Reilly looks at the same exchange and also calls attention to one of the finer moments in the discussion in which Cardinal Francis George - bless his heart - pointed out that we should be a bit shy about invoking St. Thomas More as an unambiguous defender of the rights of conscience seeing as More did, in fact, condemn heretics to the flames before his own martyrdom.
In an important albeit brief essay published at the Washington Post's "On Faith" blog, Charles Camosy looks at the furor over a recent article that sought to justify infanticide. Robert George called the article "madness," and one can sympathize with the reaction. Certainly those who assume that the forces of modernity and progress are entirely benign, need to reconsider their sunny appraisal when such arguments are made.
Michael Peppard has an intriguing essay up at Commonweal, in which he reflects on how his surroundings now, teaching at Fordham in the Bronx, alter or at least shape his worldview from when he was teaching in Colorado.
Context is not everything, and Peppard does not suggest it is. The truth is the truth whether it is in the Bronx or in the foothills of the Rockies, but Peppard is on to something no doubt. His essay reminded me of the old saying that some people's preferences (as opposed to their circumstances) reveal them to be "palace people" and other people are "cottage people," that is some like grand spaces and ornate surroundings and others prefer simplicity. I think most people have palace moments and cottage moments, and suspect that Peppard is one of them seeing as he does not describe himself as theologically infertile in either Colorado or NYC.
In the 1920s, the National Catholic Welfare Conference, the forerunner of today’s United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, threw its support behind efforts to enact child labor laws. But, there was no unanimity. Cardinal William Henry O’Connell, the archbishop of Boston, opposed the NCWC, arguing that the government had no right to interfere in parental rights and if the parents wanted their kids to work long hours in a sweatshop, so be it. O’Connell also resented the role of the NCWC more generally: After the death of Cardinal Gibbons in 1921, O’Connell was the senior churchman and thought he should be the spokesman for the Catholic Church in the U.S. not the NCWC.
I raise this historical anecdote because at this week’s meeting of the USCCB, you could discern further evidence of polarization within the bishops’ conference and the emergence of the next area of struggle: The bishops overwhelmingly decided to draft a statement on the economy and poverty.
The Journal of Southern Religion has posted a podcast of an interview I recently gave to Art Remillard, who edits the book reviews at the journal. Remillard teaches at St. Francis University in Loreto, Pennsylvania.
Here is the link.
As if more evidence was needed that Bishop Fabian Bruskewitz is the worst bishop in America, and that it is a cause for scandal that he is still gloriously reigning in Lincoln, at yesterday's USCCB meeting Bishop Bruskewitz took to the microphone. He said he had not fully read "Obamacare" which is a derogatory way of refering to the Affordable Care Act. But, he then said "somebody told me" that the Affordable Care Act included an exemption for all Muslims, because Mulims believe insurance is akin to gambling. What?
Even among the deranged rantings one frequently encounters at Fox News, I had not heard this particular line of questioning, although it nicely fits in with the ugliest, most akin to 19th century Nativism, line of attack on President Obama. Lump "Muslim" and "Obama" in the same sentence whenever possible. Suggest Muslims get preferential treatment denied to "real" Americans. Perhaps at today's session, Bishop Bruskewitz can ask the bishop of Honolulu if he has really seen Obama's birth certificate.
Yesterday I called attention to George Weigel's latest piece of agitprop at National Review Online. In a more thoughtful takedown, Tobias Winright, at Catholicmoraltheology.com, looks at the same article by Weigel. It is worthwhile looking at the comments on Winright's blog too, especially that by Beth Haile.
Cardinal Marc Ouellet went to Lough Derg the other night, a traditional site for pilgrimages of penance in Ireland with associations going back to the days of St. Patrick and, this being Ireland, where the natural and the supernatural intertwine, perhaps even before the time of St. Patrick. He met with the victims of clergy sex abuse, as Pope Benedict has done on several occasions.
The Cardinal-Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops is serving as Pope Benedict’s Legate to the International Eucharistic Congress in Dublin. He was appropriately blunt about why he had gone to Lough Derg for a night of prayer and penance:
The following letter from a group of long-time parishioners at Blessed Sacrament Parish in Washington, D.C. indicates some of the worries felt in the pews about the upcoming "Fortnight for Freedom." The statement highlights the danger of partisanship within the Church, a danger that one must hope the bishops will consider, and address, this week at their meeting in Atlanta.
Here is the text:
We are a group of thirty parishioners at The Shrine of the Most Blessed Sacrament in Washington, DC. Our group, formed into a small faith community in the 1960s, has been active in and deeply committed to our parish for all the intervening years. Blessed Sacrament is our parish community, and we have loved and served it to the best of our abilities. We have helped to build and strengthen its institutions, participated in every aspect of its spiritual and social life, seen our children educated in our parish school, and received the sacraments in our church. Our views and actions on issues of social and economic justice, war and peace, and the dignity of all peoples have been in great measure determined by our life in this faith community