Over at Religion & Politics, the online journal of the Danforth Center in Religion & Politics at Washington University in St. Louis, they have a wonderful new essay by Professor Luis Leon on Cesar Chavez. Full disclosure: I am on the advisory board of the journal.
Terry Mattingly at Get Religion expresses the same frustration I was feeling about recent stories that focus on Catholics who have left the Church. He is interested to know how many have left – 10% of the entire population of the U.S., which would make ex-Catholics a larger denomination than Episcopalians, Presbyterians or Methodists if ex-Catholics were a denomination. But, he also wants to know where they have gone.
In her interview with Kaiser Health News, Sr. Carol Keehan said this:
Sussidiario has an extraordinarily elegant essay by Santiago Ramos, a graduate student in philosophy at Boston College, and a friend I have gotten to know through Communione e Liberazione. Ramos takes on Marc Bauerline's essay, "Liberalism is Bad for Literature" and argues, I think convincingly, why Bauerline is not only wrong, but wrong in a uniquely impoverished way.
It seems that Bill Keller’s op-ed in the New York Times has created more of a stir than I had anticipated and, consequently, must be answered not ignored.
I do not know Mr. Keller. He may have once harbored grandiose ambitions for his understanding of Vatican II. He may have been treated shabbily by a priest or bishop. (Who hasn’t?) He may have been poorly catechized. Such questions come naturally to a pastor, and I wish Keller – and everyone – always had the kind of pastor who could apply balm to troubled souls.
But, Keller has put forth his argument, such as it is, as an assertion. He is pronouncing himself on ideas, not experience, and so we can assess his ideas no matter what experiences he has had. Are they true? Do those ideas show a basic grasp of history and, in this case, theology? Could the type of claims Keller makes be made, say, about economics or geo-physics, and stand up to scrutiny? Sadly, the answer to all these questions is undoubtedly negative.
Cardinal Rick Garnett, the cardinale laico of Notre Dame, has also weighed in on the President's decision regarding immigration enforcement.
Cardinal Sean O'Malley, the Archbishop of Boston, released the following statement today associating himself with Archbishop Jose Gomez's statement in support of President Obama's decision regarding undocumented immigrants brought to this country as children:
“I am very pleased by the statement of Archbishop Jose Gomez, chair of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops Committee on Migration, welcoming the actions of President Obama last Friday providing for legal protection and work authorization to thousands of undocumented youth. This action by the President makes it possible for these young men and women, who have spent most of their lives in this country, to pursue education and employment opportunities and to make a contribution to American society. The United States has historically welcomed immigrants from throughout the world, to improve their own lives and to contribute to the common good of our nation. As Archbishop Gomez said, this executive action by the President is not a substitute for passage of the DREAM Act. It is my hope that the U.S. Congress will see the wisdom of providing the full range of rights and protections which this Act contains.”
Over at The New Republic, Jonathan Cohn looks at different possible scenarios when the Supreme Court issues its ruling on the Affordable Care Act, and what those legal scenarios mean in terms of the underlying policies.
Follow an unalterable law of human nature, the more complicated the ruling the stringer the spin will be, so Cohn's look at the scenarios will help us all navigate the fog of commentary that will emerge the second after the ruling hits.
The Nelson Atkins Museum of Art in Kansas City has an exhibit of photographs the show what is left of the sites of various world's fairs.
Over at America, Duquesne law professor Nick Cafardi has a "modest proposal" for the LCWR: Go into formal schism like the Lefebvrists and wait for the Vatican to come to you! Very funny - but also kinda sad.