National Catholic Reporter

The Independent News Source

Sacrilege & Hypocrisy on Capitol Hill

Senator Jim DeMint, Tea Party favorite and just re-elected Senator from South Carolina, says it would be "sacrilegious" to keep the Senate in session until Christmas Eve. Sen. Jon Jyl of Arizona accused the Democrats of "disrespecting Christmas," by threatening to keep the body in session.

DeMint, of course, had just threatened to force the Senate to listen to a reading of the entire START Treaty, a delaying tactic that other Republicans do intend to use with regard to the omnibus spending bill. So, which is it, Sen. DeMint: It is okay to delay proceedings so you can then complain about the delay interfering with Christmas? And, Sen. Kyl has been delaying a vote on the START Treaty for weeks now, so his concerns about Christmas are equally rich. What is sacrilegious is using a religious holiday as cover for your stalling agenda.

DeMint's and Kyl's Yuletide concerns were not, however, the greatest instance of hypocrisy yesterday on Capitol Hill. That honor falls to Sen. John Cornyn and Sen. John Thune who spent the better part of a press conference explaining why they would not ask to have their earmarks removed from the omnibus spending bill despite having taken the GOP's anti-earmark pledge. They said they intended to vote against the bill, but that misses the point. If the bill passes, they get the earmarks and they get to complain about the bill because they did not vote for it. If they really think earmarks are such a bad thing, just ask for your earmarks to be removed. That can be done. Instead, the senators looked like two walking waffles.

07-04-2014.jpgThere's more to NCR than what you read online. Subscribe today!

Other GOP senators are in a similar conundrum about earmarks. The truth be told, earmarks are a non-issue or should be except that the Republicans and the Tea Party have made them seem like the real impediment to budgetary responsibility. In fact, they not only accounty for a sliver of federal spending, they never really add to federal spending: An earmark directs where the money must go, but it does not necessarily add to the transportation budget or the defense budget. An earmark removes discretion from the executive agencies, something you would think Republicans would be applauding with Obama in the White House. The entire earmark debate is one of the more absurd fun-house-mirror debates of recent years.

My advice to the GOP senators: Have a very Merry Christmas in Washington. Come to St. Matthew's for Midnight Mass, which is actually at 10 p.m. this year. And, if you still don't know what to get for that special someone, give them an earmark!

NCR Comment code: (Comments can be found below)

Before you can post a comment, you must verify your email address at Disqus.com/verify.
Comments from unverified email addresses will be deleted.

  • Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Stay on point. Comments that stray from the original idea will be deleted. NCR reserves the right to close comment threads when discussions are no longer productive.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report abuse" button. Once a comment has been flagged, an NCR staff member will investigate.

For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.

For help on how to post a comment, visit our reference page.

 

Feature-flag_GSR_start-reading.jpg

NCR Email Alerts

 

In This Issue

July 4-17, 2014

07-04-2014.jpg

Not all of our content is online. Subscribe to receive all the news and features you won't find anywhere else.