Over at The New Republic, my old pal David Greenberg reviews Martin Duberman's new biography of Howard Zinn. Here is a taste:
Duberman is exceedingly gracious toward Zinn, praising his warm heart, his honorable intentions, his noble commitments. One could almost miss the damning portrait of Zinn’s thinking that ultimately emerges. But damning it is: just as his thoughts on scholarship appear jejune, so Zinn himself—his measure taken in full—comes across as a lazy, conventional theorist, with an undeveloped political philosophy.
If you retain any fondness for Zinn, please read this essay. Taking on John Silber may be a noble endeavor, but it does not excuse bad scholarship.
Don't miss a thing: Sign up to receive free NCR email alerts.
NCR Comment code:
We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report abuse" button. Once a comment has been flagged, an NCR staff member will investigate.
For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.
For help on how to post a comment, visit our reference page.